Increased mitochondrial proline metabolism
sustains proliferation and survival of
colorectal cancer cells
AuthorsSaif AL AQBI, Lynsey Burke1☯, Inna Guterman1
, Caleb Green1
, Kevin West3
,
Raquel Palacios-Gallego1
, Hong Cai1
, Constantinos Alexandrou1¤
, Ni Ni Moe Myint1
,
Emma Parrott1
, Lynne M. Howells1
, Jennifer A. Higgins1
, Donald J. L. JonesID1,4,
Rajinder Singh1,4, Robert G. Britton1
, Cristina TufarelliID1
, Anne Thomas1
,
Alessandro Rufin
JournalPLOS ONE
AbstractResearch into the metabolism of the non-essential amino acid (NEAA) proline in cancer has
gained traction in recent years. The last step in the proline biosynthesis pathway is catalyzed
by pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (PYCR) enzymes. There are three PYCR enzymes:
mitochondrial PYCR1 and 2 and cytosolic PYCR3 encoded by separate genes. The expression of the PYCR1 gene is increased in numerous malignancies and correlates with poor
prognosis. PYCR1 expression sustains cancer cells’ proliferation and survival and several
mechanisms have been implicated to explain its oncogenic role. It has been suggested that
the biosynthesis of proline is key to sustain protein synthesis, support mitochondrial function
and nucleotide biosynthesis. However, the links between proline metabolism and cancer
remain ill-defined and are likely to be tissue specific. Here we use a combination of human
dataset, human tissue and mouse models to show that the expression levels of the proline
biosynthesis enzymes are significantly increased during colorectal tumorigenesis. Functionally, the expression of mitochondrial PYCRs is necessary for cancer cells’ survival and proliferation. However, the phenotypic consequences of PYCRs depletion could not be rescued
by external supplementation with either proline or nucleotides. Overall, our data suggest
that, despite the mechanisms underlying the role of proline metabolism in colorectal tumorigenesis remain elusive, targeting the proline biosynthesis pathway is a suitable approach
for the development of novel anti-cancer therapies.
Nociceptin Counteracts the Effects of Lipopolysaccharide
and Peptidoglycan in C6 Rat Astrocytes
AuthorsSalim Kadhim, Saif AL AQB
John MCDONALD
David LAMBERT
JournalLatin American Journal of Pharmacy
AbstractGlial cells represent the main constituent of the brain tissues. Their response to infection
and inflammation has been a growing research topic. C6 rat glioma cells were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and peptidoglycan (PEPG) with/without nociceptin/orphanin FQ. We found that treatment with both lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan resulted in decreased production of cyclin D1 and
cyclin D3, increased production of glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) and increased calcium mobilization. However, when cells treated with nociceptin, all these three effects were reversed. It can be concluded that Nociceptin can modulate cellular and molecular events associated with lipopolysaccharide and
peptidoglycan.
Circulating tumor DNA in patients with colorectal adenomas: assessment of detectability and genetic heterogeneity
AuthorsNi Ni Moe Myint, Ajay M. Verma, Daniel Fernandez-Garcia, Panchali Sarmah, Patrick S. Tarpey, Saif Sattar Al-Aqbi, Hong Cai, Ricky Trigg, Kevin West, Lynne M. Howells, Anne Thomas, Karen Brown, David S. Guttery, Baljit Singh, Howard J. Pringle, Ultan McDermott, Jacqui A. Shaw & Alessandro Rufini
JournalCell Death and Disease
AbstractImproving early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a key public health priority as adenomas and stage I cancer can be treated with minimally invasive procedures. Population screening strategies based on detection of occult blood in the feces have contributed to enhance detection rates of localized disease, but new approaches based on genetic analyses able to increase specificity and sensitivity could provide additional advantages compared to current screening methodologies. Recently, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has received much attention as a cancer biomarker for its ability to monitor the progression of advanced disease, predict tumor recurrence and reflect the complex genetic heterogeneity of cancers. Here, we tested whether analysis of cfDNA is a viable tool to enhance detection of colon adenomas. To address this, we assessed a cohort of patients with adenomas and healthy controls using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and mutation-specific assays targeted to trunk mutations. Additionally, we performed multiregional, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of adenomas and unmasked extensive heterogeneity, affecting known drivers such as APC, KRAS and mismatch repair (MMR) genes. However, tumor-related mutations were undetectable in patients’ plasma. Finally, we employed a preclinical mouse model of Apc-driven intestinal adenomas and confirmed the inability to identify tumor-related alterations via cfDNA, despite the enhanced disease burden displayed by this experimental cancer model. Therefore, we conclude that benign colon lesions display extensive genetic heterogeneity, that they are not prone to release DNA into the circulation and are unlikely to be reliably detected with liquid biopsies, at least with the current technologies.
Sensitivity of Colorectal Cancer to Arginine Deprivation Therapy is Shaped by Differential Expression of Urea Cycle Enzymes
AuthorsConstantinos Alexandrou, Saif Sattar Al-Aqbi, Jennifer A. Higgins, William Boyle, Ankur Karmokar, Catherine Andreadi, Jin-Li Luo, David A. Moore, Maria Viskaduraki, Matthew Blades, Graeme I. Murray, Lynne M. Howells, Anne Thomas, Karen Brown, Paul N. Cheng & Alessandro Rufini
JournalScientific Reports
AbstractTumors deficient in the urea cycle enzymes argininosuccinate synthase-1 (ASS1) and ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) are unable to synthesize arginine and can be targeted using arginine-deprivation therapy. Here, we show that colorectal cancers (CRCs) display negligible expression of OTC and, in subset of cases, ASS1 proteins. CRC cells fail to grow in arginine-free medium and dietary arginine deprivation slows growth of cancer cells implanted into immunocompromised mice. Moreover, we report that clinically-formulated arginine-degrading enzymes are effective anticancer drugs in CRC. Pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20), which degrades arginine to citrulline and ammonia, affects growth of ASS1-negative cells, whereas recombinant human arginase-1 (rhArg1peg5000), which degrades arginine into urea and ornithine, is effective against a broad spectrum of OTC-negative CRC cell lines. This reflects the inability of CRC cells to recycle citrulline and ornithine into the urea cycle. Finally, we show that arginase antagonizes chemotherapeutic drugs oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), whereas ADI-PEG20 synergizes with oxaliplatin in ASS1-negative cell lines and appears to interact with 5-fluorouracil independently of ASS1 status. Overall, we conclude that CRC is amenable to arginine-deprivation therapy, but we warrant caution when combining arginine deprivation with standard chemotherapy.