Orientalism: The Problematic Of The Term And Present Manifestations, An Applied Study In The Research Of The Orientalist Dimitri Frolov (The Stone In The Holy Qur’an
The shift from the hostile colonial approach, which we find in the book by many fanatical orientalists, to Orientalism is critical issues in which the pains that are historically related to peace differ from luminous to fascinate the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be upon him and his family) b as an expression of orientalists and success in the righteousness of his people and building the Islamic state These transformations and transitions affected the one who was armed with another in Orientalism, and he is called Ily Nag Rah, by claiming to change. In the approach, especially after the openness between cultures and intellectual exchanges with Islamic countries only, which prevents this term from perpetuating it and remains on it for the R associated with its negative image coupled with an anti-peace view. Only these reasons and their constraints are called by changing the term orientalism i.e. me and other names called by some contemporary orientalists, But the question is, changing the term means a difference for the highest goals and motives, and am I counting, for the indication we do not call it the new Orientalism and the opposite of the previous approach? A and E, respectively, new approaches in their study of non-Islam with the public image and the Qur'an in particular? This is what we will hide through our follow-up to the writings of the orientalists of the Qur’an presented at the thirty-fifth conference on Asian and North African Studies in Budapest in July 1997, which called for the need to change the term x. Roll of a negative character through the position of the Orientalists who are hostile to non-peace and review what the Russian Orientalist Dmitry Frolov presented as a model for that.