LEGISLATIVE DEFICIENCY IN ORGANIZING JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATING HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL RULES
الباحث الأول:
Dr. Karrar Imad Raheem Alasadi
الباحثين الآخرين:
لا يوجد
المجلة:
Technology Journal of Management , Accounting and Economics (TECH)
تاريخ النشر:
19 ديسمبر، 2024
مختصر البحث:
Abstract
Until 1989, the judicial system in Iraq was considered one of the unified judicial systems. In this year, the Administrative Judicial Court was established in accordance with Law No. 106 of 1989, the Second Amendment Law to the State Shure…
Abstract
Until 1989, the judicial system in Iraq was considered one of the unified judicial systems. In this year, the Administrative Judicial Court was established in accordance with Law No. 106 of 1989, the Second Amendment Law to the State Shure Council Law No. 65 of 1979, as amended. Under this amendment, this court had jurisdiction to consider... The legitimacy of administrative decisions, regardless of who issued them. Hence, it was assumed that the matter would apply to administrative penalties imposed for violating the rules of health administrative control, followed by purely administrative decisions issued by an administrative body, namely the various health departments. From here, we must ask whether this assumption is valid. Is it achieved, or has the Iraqi legislator regulated the means of control been deficient? Especially since the legislator has designated certain bodies to consider the validity of decisions to impose administrative health penalties.
