Benner
احمد عذاب الزبيدي ( أستاذ مساعد )
كلية الطب - انف واذن وحنجرة
[email protected]
 
 
 
Comparison Between The Sensitivity Of Ultrasoundand Conventional X-Rays In Diagnosing Nasal Bone Fracture
تحميل
بحث النوع:
طب التخصص العام:
ا.د رائد حليم السعد اسم الناشر:
ا.م د احمد عذاب الزبيدي د رجاء عزيز جبار اسماء المساعدين:
Kufa Journal for Nursing Sciences الجهة الناشرة:
Kufa Journal of Nursing publishes two numbers a year. For each issue, all of the volume, number, and year will be idetified on the page of the journal cover.  
2020 سنة النشر:

الخلاصة

Abstract: A cross-sectional study was conducted in AL- Sadir medical city in AL Najaf-Iraq, during the period between July 2011 to March 2012, 35 patients aged 1 to 45 years with nasal bone fracture who underwent physical examination Aim: To evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of nasal bone fracture in comparison with conventional X ray sensitivity. Aim of study: to evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of nasal bone fracture versus sensitivity of X-ray. Patient & method: these patients were examined by conventional lateral nasal bone radiography followed by sonography without knowing the result of x-ray report and physical examination. Results: In this study a 35 patients who had nasal bone fracture according to physical examination were investigated by sonography and radiography.Of these patients, 30 were men and 5 were women, with mean age of patients was 18.63 years. The current study revealed an x ray sensitivity approaching 60% , specificity was 86.7%. respectively. While the results showed that ultrasonography sensitivity was 80% , specificity was 6.7%.compared with clinical examination. The present study showed comparison of both tests that ultrasonography sensitivity was 80% , specificity was 6.7%، while x-ray was 60%, 86.7% .Also the results showed patients gender distribution of the nasal bone fracture with female and male percentage of 14.3% and 85.7% respectively. The results showed depending on trauma type domestic , RTA, and direct, the percentage rate was 34.3%, 11.4% and 54.3 % respectively. Also the results showed